Law &
Ethics
The Extradition Question:
Immunity and the Head of State
By Sara Criscitelli
In 1999 the United Kingdom’s House of Lords justified the possible extradition of Augusto Pinochet, Chile’s former head of state, to Spain for prosecution on torture-related charges. Its decision in Regina v Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet recognized that heads of state generally enjoy immunity under international law; a British statute also confers immunity upon them. Nonetheless, it concluded, in the narrow circumstances presented in that case, that the UN Convention Against Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (the Torture Convention) and British domestic legislation trumped Pinochet’s head of state immunity.1 Human rights advocates hoped the decision would impel other nations to bring heads of state to justice who commit atrocities in their official capacities and presume impunity.2 more...
