|
|
ISSUE 5.2: SUMMER/FALL 2004 |
|
Reinvesting in the Art of NATO: The President's Best Strategic Option David Abshire and S. Wesley Cross
International discourse about the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has overlooked the organization's real potential and capability to tackle security challenges that the United States and Europe face today. Respected writers and publications have repeatedly misunderstood or misrepresented the United States's most valuable foreign policy instrument: the roundtable of its closest allies. NATO critics from the left and right on both sides of the Atlantic have declared NATO a Cold War dinosaur, chided it as a lackey of U.S. policy, or deemed it multilateral quicksand. E. Wayne Merry, a former U.S. diplomat and Soviet expert, blames NATO for transatlantic squabbling: "NATO is not the solution to this split; it is at the heart of the problem."1 Joseph Jaffe, editor of the German weekly Die Zeit, issued an even harsher condemnation of NATO: "The Atlantic Alliance has been dying a slow death ever since Christmas Day 1991, when the Soviet Union committed suicide by dissolution. Having won the Cold War, the alliance lost its central purpose and began to crumble like a bridge no longer in use-slowly, almost invisibly."2 David Abshire is President and CEO of the Center for the Study of the Presidency. He served as U.S. Ambassador to NATO under President Ronald Reagan.
The full text of this article is available in print-locked form. To purchase the full text of this article, please visit the reprints page. |
|